There have been a few tweets recently about the RHS being unethical. This accusation rather surprised me, so I questioned one of the tweeters about their use of the word unethical; I was curious to know what made them arrive at this conclusion.
The response was to direct me to a blog, which expressed disappointment that the RHS had apparently withdrawn its peat policy and “refuses to go peat free”. This seemed to be the reason for the unethical accusation.
So I began my own research into the debate, using the RHS website and google.